Showing posts with label Frank Wren. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Frank Wren. Show all posts

Thursday, February 11, 2010

Bring Smoltzie Back, Mr. Wren


The excitement and sadness of September 27, 1987 still resonate to this day. Having already celebrated my 16th birthday and my new license to drive my own personal tank (a '77 Monte Carlo from which I would emerge scratch-free after running it into a ditch a few weeks later during a marching band scavenger hunt), it was 9/27 when my favorite baseball team was exorcising itself of one of the dumbest of many dumb moves it made through the '70's and '80's. Given the current state of John Smoltz's career, Braves' management today would do well to learn the lesson it should have learned from the way the team handled Phil Niekro more than two decades ago.

It was sunny in Atlanta when Niekro, 48 years old, took the mound for the final time. The reigning king of the knuckleball had been justifiably released earlier in the year by both the Cleveland Indians and Toronto Blue Jays and knew that his 24th big league season would be his last. The Braves, where Niekro spent the first 20 years of his big league life, signed him specifically so he could pitch his last game in his old home ballpark. For three innings, it was as if Niekro were 28 again, as he tossed shut out ball against the Giants. But the clock struck midnight in the fourth, as Knucksie gave up a couple of runs and left his final game with the bases loaded, runs driven in and charged to Niekro when Candy Maldonado hit a grand slam off reliever Chuck Cary, in what eventually was a blowout win for San Fran. Still, for those of us who grew up with an aging but effective Niekro as one of the few highlights of our lovable losers, it was wonderful to see him in a Braves' uniform one more time, especially since they shouldn't have let him go in the first place.

In 1983, a 44-year-old Niekro was a league-average pitcher for the Braves, going 11-10 with a 3.97 ERA (98 ERA+). When Ted Turner decided he was too old to pitch and should instead marry a hippie and join the front office, Niekro instead signed with the New York Yankees and proved him wrong, having his last excellent season in '84 (16-8, 3.09, 123 ERA+). Knucksie followed with a league-average season at age 46 (16-12, 4.09, 98 ERA+), with his final win of 1985 being number 300 for his career. After George Steinbrenner decided he was too old to pitch and should instead join the front office and fire George Castanza, the Indians signed Niekro. Amazingly, he was almost league-average again at age 47 (11-11, 4.32, 96 ERA+) before the old knuckleball finally gave up the ghost in '87.

So besides being good PR to keep one of your icons in your team's uniform for his entire career, would an average pitcher who avoided injury have helped the Braves on the field during those years? Let's look at Atlanta's staff in the years Niekro was still effective, 1984-86. In '84, the Braves had just two pitchers make at least 29 starts and have a league-average or better season, Rick Mahler (123 ERA+) and Pascual Perez (103). In '85, that number was again two, Mahler at 118 and Steve Bedrosian at 100. In '86, the only decent Braves starter was David Palmer, who made 35 starts with an ERA+ of 108. While Knucksie certainly wouldn't have helped those pathetic teams make the playoffs, the Braves most assuredly would have been better than 80-82, 66-96, and 72-89 those three seasons with Niekro on the hill every fifth day.

Atlanta now faces a similar conundrum with Smoltz, who turns 43 in May. Number 29 doesn't have a team right now, and Jeff Schultz of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution says Bobby Cox placed a call to Smoltzie recently. For Smoltz to come back to Atlanta, either for a full season or as a late-season addition, general manager Frank Wren would have to eat a big plate of fried crow over grits. Despite clear evidence that Smoltz had recovered from what felt like his 87th surgery in 2008, Wren decided it was a fabulous time to do Brett Favre role play and not make up his mind on re-signing Smoltz. Granted, it appeared that Wren was prescient when Smoltz signed with the Red Sox and promptly rang up an 8.32 ERA in eight starts before the Sox gave up on him. But then, the Cardinals signed Smoltz, and he showed he still had something left with an ERA just barely below league-average (4.26, 96 ERA+), as well as 40 strikeouts in 38 innings over 7 starts. Mr. Wren should loosen his belt and chow down, because Smoltzie doesn't belong in any other uniform than the one with the tomahawk across the belly.

Signing Smoltz would help Wren extricate himself from the first serious mistake of his tenure. An icon who should never have left the team will be back where he belongs, and unlike Niekro, he could help the Braves get to the postseason. Smoltz will probably tell you he can still be an effective starter, and the Braves probably don't have room in their rotation for him right now. At this point, though, I bet Smoltz would rather pitch than not pitch, and as Martha Stewart always says, an extra arm in the bullpen is a good thing. Especially when that arm can still throw 92 and belongs to one of the greatest relief pitchers in Braves' history. Atlanta repeated a bad portion of that history with their dismissal of Smoltz just over a year ago. Let's hope they take advantage of the golden opportunity before them to correct it.

Friday, January 22, 2010

Glavine can come back, but only if he pulls a Nature Boy

Tom Glavine reportedly is coming back to the Atlanta Braves, either as a broadcaster or in some sort of front office role. If he does, he should make an entrance like this...


Glavine cutting a promo where he says "There are three reasons I returned to the Braves. Number one, I hate the New York Mets..." would help me forgive him for being so p.....errr, rhymes-with-hissy when the Braves released him last year and for his role in the players' side of the work stoppage of 1994. Seriously, it would be nice to see Glavine with the organization that helped make him a future hall-of-famer, and if Glavine is smart, he would know he will probably outlast the man who released him, General Manager Frank Wren.

Not that Wren was wrong to release Glavine, he wasn't. Wren's mistake was waiting so long as to give the impression that Glavine would pitch again, when it was obvious to everyone except Glavine that he was done....at the end of 2007. Sure, he was 13-8 with a 4.45 ERA for the Mets that year, but his ERA was only that low because of the 2.80 he posted in March/April of that season. Glavine had a 5.83 ERA in June of '07, 5.14 in July, and 6.10 in September/October. When he gave up seven earned runs in only one-third of an inning in his final start of 2007 against the Marlins, the consensus was that, great as he once was, Glavine's arm might as well have been an udon noodle.

But Glavine didn't go. He came back home to Atlanta for one last go of it. But when he went 2-4, 5.54, with 37 walks and 37 Ks in 63.1 innings before getting hurt, Wren should have been man enough to say there wouldn't be room for him in '09. Wren didn't. Glavine's feelings were justifiably hurt, and the Braves had managed to hack off two legends (Glavine and John Smoltz) within the first six months of '09. Now, the healing has apparently begun, which is good for everyone.

Still, I'd love to see Glavine break character just once and lay the smack down. You know it is in him, because he used to be a hockey player. Wonder how much it would take for Glavine, should he join the broadcast crew, to go Hanson Brothers on the Mets? Oh, and just so there is no misunderstanding, there is only one true set of Hanson Brothers, and they will break your friggin' "Mmmm Bop" neck.

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Should the Braves go after Johnny Damon?

Jeff Schultz of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution is among those who believe the Braves should make a run at free agent outfielder Johnny Damon, late of the New York Yankees. The Yankees seem reluctant to re-sign Damon as his agent, Scott Boras, originally asked for a two-year contract worth $14 million.

While Damon could certainly help the Braves, especially since they only got Melky Cabrera for Javier Vazquez, part of Schultz's reasoning is that Nate McLouth "looked only average" last year. Certainly, McLouth wasn't a superstar in 2009, but his 3.6 WAR (Wins Above Replacement) ranked him fifth among National League center fielders. He is projected to be about the same as he was last year, which isn't great, but is definitelyabove average.

McLouth also is 28, and Damon is 36. Still, Damon would be a good pickup for at least one year unless he has a complete meltdown offensively, unlikely if he moved to the weaker National League. Damon had a 3.0 WAR in 2009, and that number was dragged down by his terrible left field defense. His wRC+ (weighted Runs Created, adjusted for ballpark) was 132, meaning he was 32-percent better on the offensive side of the ball than the average American Leaguer. Needless to say, that's pretty dang good, and even a small drop in production in 2010 would be light years ahead of the waste of uniform material that was Garrett Anderson (a negative 1.0 WAR) in '09.

So yes, Johnny Damon would help the Braves, but Schultz makes the mistake of saying the Braves need him so they will have (cue the big ballsy voice guy) a "legitimate leadoff hitter." Jeff trots out the tired old line used by many. "The Braves have not had a legitimate leadoff hitter since Rafael Furcal left town after the 2005 season. That’s also the last season they made the playoffs. Funny how that works out." Gee, I wonder how the Dodgers made the playoffs in '09 without a "legitimate leadoff hitter" (LLH) last season? They had Furcal, you say? If the main function of an LLH is to get on base, then in the immortal words of children's book author Dan Gutman (who also wrote the baseball classic "It Ain't Cheating If You Don't Get Caught), nah-nah-nah boo-boo on you. Furcal had a .335 OBP in '09, 17 points below McLouth and 30 points below Damon. The Cardinals also made the playoffs without an LLH, and the World Series runner-up Phillies alleged LLH, Jimmy Rollins, had a sterling OBP of .296.

You say that bolsters Schultz's argument that Damon is a LLH? Only problem with that is that Damon hit behind Derek Jeter almost all of last season because Damon's legs are not Derek Jeter's legs (Jeter had 30 steals to Johnny's 12). I'm not saying Damon would be a bad pickup for the Braves, because he could help the team. Even though it might be disastrous from a defensive standpoint, having McLouth and Damon hit 1-2 in the lineup for a full season would, if they stayed healthy, be potent and would take some of the pressure off an aging Chipper Jones. What I am saying is that Schultz and others are mistaken in their thinking that Atlanta needs a LLH to win. Not only that, McLouth is closer to being a LLH than is Johnny Damon.

I don't think Frank Wren will spend the money on Damon because Wren is either incompetent or is handicapped by the money changers above him. The Braves have already committed $3.1 million to Cabrera, and I doubt they did that with the idea of platooning Melky with Matt Diaz until Jason Heyward is ready. Still, if Wren finds enough pennies under the couch to sign Damon, I hope he will outlaw razor blades from his locker so we can once again see the grubby Damon from the Red Sox "idiots" days, as immortalized in an "Arthur" cartoon on PBS that was one of my daughter's favorites.